Infrastructures of Sense|Making. Autumn School
Konstanz, Germany (5.-7.10.2020), 24. May 2020.
Organized by the Research Unit “Media and Participation. Between Demand and Entitlement”, in cooperation with the Research College “SENSING: The Knowledge of Sensitive Media” (Potsdam)
NEW DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS: 24 MAY 2020
Contemporary modes of Teilhabe (participation) in media-infused environments unfold within material and bodily infrastructures as the ground for any form of sense|making. Infrastructures, far from being mere functional connections between entities or the conveyance of information, come to define the connective tissue between social, material, and aesthetic domains in digital cultures of the 21 st century. Part and parcel of such an infrastructural shift are processes of data generation and its marketability, platform-based forms of organization of information, and knowledge, but also new relations between (mobile) interfaces, discursive frameworks, and human sense modalities where the boundaries between organic and technological spheres become more and more porous. It seems to be a critical moment to scrutinize the question whether and how human sense|making is related to, and thus collides with, the intra-sensing of various agencies and the infra-sensing of techno-material processes. Immanent to these material and processual operations are thus multiple couplings of sensing and sense|making, that is, between sensors, sensation and meaning. Instead of locating such sensuous and techno-sensory regimes and attached meaning structures in predefined places of power, such as institutions, the notion of infrastructure underlines what comes to pass as sensed or registered and the occurrence of meaning depends on dynamic processes of participation.
How such emergent forms of Teilhabe occur with and through the sensuous materialities of infrastructures in order to yield meaningful effects defines the key concern of this autumn school. We conceive of participation as a process of infrastructuring with and through sensuous realms of the human and more-than-human, in order to generate different forms of sense|making. In these relational frameworks, inclusion and exclusion often are enmeshed with infrastructure operations, data generation/discrimination, and processing involving specific time economies. Drawing on research in new sensory technologies and their networked ecologies (aiming at, and being out, of control), new platforms for sensory agencies such a hearing aids, mobile media, temporalities of delay in infrastructural data curating such as online-streaming services, and the aesthetic dimensions of techno-political activism or militant art practices lie at the heart of the multi-layered conjunction between infrastructures and sense|making.
Rather than presuming a clear divide between technological infrastructure and human user, or technical interfaces and the human body, the autumn school aims at emphasizing the affective, material, and often economically driven realities of contemporary sociotechnical systems in their capacities but also constraints for various politics of participation. We wish to engage early career researchers and postdocs from a wide range of fields, such as media studies, cultural studies, sociology, science studies, cultural anthropology, HCI, philosophy of technology, aesthetics, art theory, social movements research, and performance studies to explore the infrastructural dimensions of sense|making in their material, technological, embodied, economic, computational, affective, haptic, and operational dimensions.
Potential subjects of inquiry could be:
• relations of power and knowledge in infrastructures of sense|making
• dimensions of de-sensing, in-sensing, and de-affection
• sensor technologies and more-than-human processes of sensing
• VR-based infrastructuring of seeing and hearing
• hearing technology platforms (hearing aids, cochlear implants)
• infrastructures of seeing, platformization of seeing practices
• decolonial and queer critiques of infrastructures and modes of participation
• sensuous matter/materialities of infrastructures / infrastructures of sense
• case studies relating to haptic media and the sensuous
• motion gestures as practices of sense|making
• mobile device-based infrastructures of data collections and meaning structures
• algorithmic forms of power/control through infrastructuring sense
• temporalities: analysis of practical scenes of idling, waiting and interruption as well as historical analysis of these technologies
• recommender systems: analysis of scenes of making (non)sense of the world through the interfaces, categories and genres of recommendation
• aesthetic and activist practices of sense|making with and through technological, artistic, and social infrastructures
• emergent processes of infrastructuring as modes of (aesthetic) resistance
• re-distribution of the sensible through alternative, technopolitical, infrastructures and platforms
• infrastructure and modes of participation through the sensuous
• ‘ruins and rubble’ of infrastructures and digital media
• modes of dis/assembling collectives through infrastructural experiences and processes of sense|making, i.e. calculated publics or networked audiences
Successful completion of the autumn school can be awarded with 5 credits according to the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS). Credits will be awarded on the base of preparatory readings, 100 % (active) participation during the course, and impulse presentation.
Please hand in a one-page paper on how questions of infrastructures and sense|making are central to your own work and research. Please send your paper and a short biographical note to email@example.com by April 13, 2020. Please, feel free to direct any questions concerning the Autumn School to us.
Anand, N., Gupta, A., Appel, H. (eds) (2018): The Promise of infrastructures. Durham: Duke University Press.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.
Berlant, L. (2016). The Commons: Infrastructures for Troubling Times. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (3): 393–419.
Farman, Jason (2018). Delayed Response. The Art of Waiting from the Ancient to the Instant World. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Gabrys, Jennifer (2016). Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet. University of Minnesota Press.
Gordillo, Gastón R. (2014). Rubble. The Afterlife of Destruction. Duke University Press.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
Harney, S. (2015). Hapticality in the Undercommons. In: Routledge Companion to Art and Politics, ed. by Randy Martin, pp. 173-179.
Hayles, N. Katherine (2014). Cognition Everywhere: The Rise of the Cognitive Nonconscious and the Costs of Consciousness. New Literary History 45 (2): 199–220 .O’Neill, C. (2017). Haptic Media and the Cultural Techniques of Touch: The Sphygmograph, Photoplethysmography and the Apple Watch. New Media & Society 19 (10): 1615–1631.
Parisi, D., Paterson, M., and Archer, J. E. (2017). Haptic media studies. New Media & Society, 19/10: 1513–1522.
Parks, L., and Starosielski, N. (2015) (eds.): Signal traffic: Critical studies of media infrastructures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N. et al. (2018): Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20 (1): 293–310.
Star, S. L., and Ruhleder, K. 1996: ‘Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research 7 (1): 111–134.
Sundaram, R. (2015). Post-Postcolonial Sensory Infrastructure. E-Flux Journal 63 <https://www.e-flux.com/journal/64/60858/post-postcolonial-sensory-infras....
Tellioğlu, H., Habiger, M., and Cech, F. (2017). Infrastructures for Sense Making. Infrahealth 2017 - Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Infrastructure in Healthcare. <https://dl.eusset.eu/bitstream/20.500.12015/2908/1/infrahealth2017_paper....